Which principle must always be considered when an officer makes the decision to use force?

The principle of reasonableness and necessity is a fundamental standard that must guide an officer's decision to use force. This principle emphasizes that any use of force must be both appropriate and justified given the circumstances at hand. The reasonableness standard requires that the actions of the officer be aligned with a reasonable officer's responses under similar conditions, taking into account the context, severity of the situation, and the threat posed by the subject.

Furthermore, the necessity aspect evaluates whether the use of force is essential to achieve a legitimate law enforcement goal, such as preventing harm to others, apprehending a fleeing suspect, or ensuring officer safety. This principle helps instill accountability in police actions and aligns with constitutional standards regarding an individual's rights.

In contrast, focusing on factors like maintaining control of the situation, the element of surprise, or the need for immediate action, while potentially relevant in certain contexts, do not encompass the comprehensive assessment required for the ethical and legal use of force. Reasonableness and necessity serve as a foundation to evaluate whether the officer's response was suitable to the circumstances, ensuring that force is only employed as a last resort when absolutely needed.