What should officers prioritize when confronted with resisting subjects?

When officers are confronted with resisting subjects, prioritizing verbal communication and de-escalation tactics is vital for several reasons. Firstly, these approaches aim to reduce tension and conflict, allowing officers to diffuse a potentially violent situation without resorting to physical force. Effective communication can convey a sense of authority while also showing empathy, which may calm individuals who are agitated or resistant.

De-escalation tactics focus on understanding the individual's perspective and establishing a connection, which can be more effective than immediately engaging physically. This strategy can lead to compliance and cooperation, thereby enhancing the safety of all parties involved, including the officers, the resisting subject, and bystanders. Prioritizing these methods aligns with modern policing principles, which emphasize the importance of minimizing unnecessary use of force, reducing the risk of injury, and building community trust.

In contrast, rapidly establishing a physical hold may escalate the situation, especially if the individual perceives the officer's actions as threatening. Requesting immediate backup, while potentially necessary in some cases, should not take precedence over efforts to communicate and de-escalate. Similarly, showcasing strength and discipline can lead to increased resistance and does not foster a cooperative environment. Therefore, employing verbal communication and de-escalation tactics should always be the first