Can police officers use force against passive resistance?

The option stating that police officers can use force against passive resistance, but it must be reasonable and proportional, is grounded in the principles of use of force that emphasize the necessity of justifiable and measured responses to resistance.

When encountering passive resistance, officers are expected to assess the situation critically and apply only the level of force that is appropriate to gain compliance and control while still respecting the individual's rights. The reasonableness of the force is determined by various factors, including the severity of the situation, the threat posed by the individual, and the totality of the circumstances.

For instance, if an individual is passively resisting arrest or failing to comply with an officer's commands, the officer may employ techniques such as joint locks or physical guidance to move the person without resorting to excessive or harmful measures. The goal is to resolve the situation while minimizing harm to both the individual and the officer, reflecting a balance of enforcement and respect for civil liberties.

Ultimately, this approach aligns with the principles of de-escalation and the use of minimal necessary force, ensuring that officers act within the limits of the law and departmental policies.